What does the data say: Partisan divide and skepticism towards vaccines in Georgia?  

Shota Kakabadze[1]

Just a couple of days ago, the Minister of Health of Georgia remarked that the anti-vaxxer campaign had been defeated and that there was a considerable increase in the demand for vaccines. The latter might be indeed the case, if one takes into consideration how fast most of the available spots  for the Chinese-produced vaccine were booked once this became available for everyone above 18 years old. Since the very start of vaccination programme against COVID-19 in Georgia, the number of citizens who have received at least one dose of the vaccine stands at around 71 570, with an average of 2500-3000 shots being administered daily. Yet, this is still less than what is needed for the Georgian government’s mass immunization plan. In comparison,  Estonia with a population of little more than 1 million, administered 12,919 doses of vaccine in a single day.

As of writing, on the special website launched by the Georgian authorities to keep track of all those willing to get vaccinated, only around 86 000 people ( 2% of the population) are registered. An opinion poll found that Georgia, with only 48% of population willing to get a jab, stands considerably low on the global scale. The NDI opinion poll from February 2021 shows that 53% of respondents said they would not want to be vaccinated and the reason provided by the significant majority of them was that they did not trust the quality of the vaccine. Although the recent Gallup poll paints a more optimistic picture – 56% of Georgians willing to take a COVID-19 vaccine – these numbers are still quite significant and perhaps the reasons are more political than it might seem at first glance.

Anti-vaxxers beyond Russian disinformation campaigns

When examining anti-vaxxer campaigns in Georgia, whether in the traditional or the social media, the focus of most reports produced so far has been on its connection with anti-Western propaganda coming from Russian sources. IDFI in 2020 published a report summarizing the connections between some media outlets and the so-called “firehose of falsehood” coming from Russia aimed against the United States, the European Union or Bill Gates. The usual target of anti-vaxxer propaganda in Georgia is the Lugar Research Center, 5G internet being blamed for COVID-19,  or Bill Gates who allegedly wants to insert microchip into everyone through the vaccination. The main focus of anti-vaccination disinformation campaigns has been to discredit western pharmaceutical companies working on vaccines as well as the World Health Organization. 

However, while such disinformation campaigns have their own audience and outreach, this is not enough to explain why scepticism towards vaccine is so high in Georgia. Reasons for such low trust in vaccines, and in the immunization process in general, should perhaps be sought elsewhere rather than just anti-vaxxer propaganda and fake news. A CRRC survey from January 2021 points to a visible connection between partisanship and openness to getting the jab. According to the same study, 27% was the number among Georgian Dream supporters who said they wouldn’t get vaccinated, in comparison to 41% for the supporters of opposition parties and 46% of nonpartisans were against receiving the dose. The division along party lines becomes even more apparent when trust in the vaccine is analyzed. Among the supporters of opposition parties those who do not trust is 72%in comparison to 38% of Georgian Dream supporters who say they do not trust vaccines.

The roots of scepticism

These numbers indicate that anti-vaxxer sentiments in the Georgian context are a little more complicated, and the Russian misinformation campaign is limited to a very specific audience. The political context and partisan divide could better explain why the Georgian score is so high on scepticism towards vaccines.  The roots of distrust could be traced to what Lincoln Mitchell has called “extreme partisanship where political questions, and indeed perceptions of political reality, are filtered through partisan sentiments, but where the substantive issues dividing the parties are not all that significant.” Or to put it differently, while an absolute majority of political parties and actors agree on the benefits and need of vaccination, the partisan bias has been visible in the way that the private media has been handling the pandemic from the very start.

For example, already in the spring of 2020 one of the main oppositional TV channel in Georgia staged a so-called experiment to prove that facemasks produced in Georgia did not protect against COVID-19. Similarly, while the opposition was pressuring the government  about importing vaccines, it was, at the same time,  vowing to oppose vaccine produced in China (which is at the moment is the only one available for  mass immunization). On the other hand, the performance of the Georgian authorities responsible for the immunization program does not help to increase trust in vaccines either. Firstly, there was ambiguity on whether the Georgian Minister of Health was going to be among the first ones to get vaccinated, then came the death of a nurse after a vaccine shot, which according to the Prosecutor’s office  is attributed to the negligence from the doctors’ side. Additionally, a timely information campaign and incentives for those willing to get vaccinated are still lacking.

In summary, distrust is more towards the Georgian authorities and the political party in charge, rather than in vaccination in general and even “anti-vaxxers” might not be the proper term to describe most of the people scepticism about getting a jab.

Is there a way out?

It is vital to address the misinformation campaign that is actively spread in social media channels and usually associated with platforms sharing pro-Kremlin sentiments. Myth Detector, Factcheck and other similar portals in Georgia actively work in this direction. However, what opinion polls suggest is that the problem is more substantial and that the partisan divide plays a role in whether somebody is willing to get a jab or not. Root causes of the distrust are more homegrown and interlinked with  extreme partisanship.

The recent surge in demand for Chinese-produced vaccine might go against the argument put forward so far. However, the picture is more complex and those who were able to register are from the big urban centers, with demand in rural areas being low.

Political actors and public figures from all sides in Georgia need to act more responsibly on politization of healthcare and refrain from exploiting the vaccination process for short-term political gains. Even though most Georgian opposition parties do not engage in anti-vaxxer campaigns, partisan bias still spills over. Thus, perhaps more active engagement in mass popularization of immunization, not only from the ruling party but also the opposition actors and media channels, as well as from the Georgian Orthodox Church, is needed to address such high levels of scepticism towards vaccines in Georgia.

[1]  Junior Policy Analyst at the Georgian Institute of Politics


Photo by Steven Cornfield on Unsplash

Jean Monnet European Dialogue – Next Step towards Consensus-Oriented Politics

Nino Samkharadze[1]

Although the first stage of the EU’s mediation during the ongoing Georgian political crisis initially failed, Georgian political parties continue to discuss the terms of the agreement within the EU’s mediation framework.[2] During different stages of the discussion process, the agreement has now been signed by the governing Georgian Dream party and Girchi, a libertarian movement. In this respect, it can be said that the consensus-achieving process has been relaunched, and evaluation of the specific components of the deal is once again the subject of active discussion. (more…)


EU Mediation in Georgia’s Political Crisis: What did We (not) Understand?

Nino Samkharadze  [1]

For five months, Georgia has faced a severe political crisis that has been worrying enough for its European partners to express unprecedented interest in the country’s ongoing political processes. Indeed, the EU has been actively involved  in attempting to solve the crisis: the President of the European Council, Charles Michel, was in charge of mediating an inter-party dialogue, and even mandated a personal envoy, Christian Danielsson, to engage in the mediation process. However, even the very high-level involvement of the EU proved unsuccessful: the Georgian political elite did not manage to reach an agreement, and the EU mediation in Georgia is considered to have failed at this stage. (more…)


Inter-party Negotiations in a Time of Crisis: What Hinders an Effective Dialogue?

Nino Samkharadze [1]

Georgia has faced an unfolding political crisis over the last few months. Despite the active participation of trustworthy international actors, including the President of the European Council in the post-election political dialogue, there are still no signs of consensus and negotiations remain quite tense.

Considering the government’s plan to further Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic integration and apply for EU membership in 2024, a constructive inter-party dialogue, and an fair solution to the political crisis in the country is essential. As always, the uncompromising tactics and positions of existing political parties hinder an effective agreement. (more…)


The Georgian Far-right through the Lens of Freedom of Expression

Nino Kvirikashvili[1]

[The blog is published with the financial support of the Open Society Georgia Foundation. The views, opinions and statements expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs only and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Foundation. Therefore, the Open Society Georgia Foundation is not responsible for the content of the information material]. 



Serbia’s Snap Parliamentary Elections: A Case for Georgia?

Salome Kandelaki[1]

[This publication was produced with the support of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Endowment for Democracy]. 

Serbia is among the countries, that held elections during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spring 2020 and as in case of Georgia, most of the Serbian opposition parties called the elections illegitimate. According to the official report of Republic Election Commission of Serbia, the coalition under the ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) won the elections by 60.65% (188 seats out of 250). The five-month-long opposition protest that started on the day of the elections, ended with the President Alexander Vucic announcing snap elections in 2022 to be held along with the Presidential elections. To what extent can Georgia use the example of Serbia to defuse the crisis and normalize the situation? (more…)


Facing Covid-19: How adequate is the government’s social policy?

Salome Kandelaki[1]

Due to the severity of the epidemiological situation caused by Covid-19, Georgia has entered a difficult socio-economic stage. To prevent the collapse of the healthcare system, the government imposed a range of targeted restrictions, including closing shops, restaurants, and fitness centers, as well as halting public and intercity transport. As a result, the country has faced a deepening economic decline and a further worsening of the broader social situation. By November 2020, 162 220 citizens had lost their salaries due to the pandemic, and the situation for unregistered street vendors and socially vulnerable people had become acutely complicated. (more…)


A Region lost? In the South Caucasus: The West is out, Turkey is in, and Russia is stronger than ever


Bidzina Lebanidze[1]

The South Caucasus region has recently witnessed significant upheavals: a war between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabagh, political chaos in Armenia, post-election turmoil in Georgia, and a shifting geopolitical dynamic between Russia and Turkey. As Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia walk a thin line between maintaining security, attempting modernization and navigating an increase in Russian and Turkish influence, the West risks losing its limited regional influence altogether.  (more…)


The Veiled Influence of Illiberal Groups on Georgian Politics

Nino Gozalishvili[1]

[This publication was produced with the financial support of the Open Society Georgia Foundation. The views, opinions and statements expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs only and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Foundation. Therefore, the Open Society Georgia Foundation is not responsible for the content of the information material].

Over the past several years Georgia has witnessed an increase in the public presence of far-right groups both in the media and across the political spectrum. Nativist attitudes, anti-LGBTQ and anti-immigration rhetoric, and direct appeals to the Orthodox church are the main points of convergence for these illiberal actors who range from moderate to extreme. (more…)


Can Georgia Deliver Democratic Elections?

* The Blog is originally published by PONARS Eurasia

(PONARS Eurasia Commentary) Recently, Georgia’s ruling party, Georgian Dream (GD), proclaimed its intention to formally apply for EU membership in 2024, against all odds. The statement was made at an important time: just as the Black Sea country heads toward parliamentary elections on October 31, 2020. The democratic quality of the elections will have a significant impact on Georgia’s European aspirations and its future with the EU and NATO. (more…)